Pages

Wednesday, 30 May 2012

Protests as FG renames UNILAG after Abiola

Students of the University of Lagos protesting Federal Government’s  renaming of the school to Moshood Abiola University in Lagos ... on Tuesday
Anger and protest on Tuesday greeted the decision of President Goodluck Jonathan to rename the 50-year-old University of Lagos after the acclaimed winner of the 1993 presidential election, the late Chief Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Abiola.
The renaming of UNILAG, now Moshood Abiola University, Lagos, after the late business mogul, came 14 years after the citizens hadAbiola’s clamoured for the recognition of his place in the democratic journey of the country.
But few minutes after Jonathan announced the renaming of the institution in his Democracy Day speech, students of the university trooped onto the streets in protest of the new name though they made it clear that they had nothing against the person of the late Abiola.
They described the renaming as “provocative and unpopular.”
Abiola’s daughters
But the Abiola family hailed the government for renaming UNILAG after their dead patriarch.
Abiola’s first child, Lola Abiola-Edewor; and Hafsat Abiola-Costello, said that the Federal Government should be commended for recognising the contribution of the late politician to the return of democracy in Nigeria.
Abiola-Edewor, a two-term member of the House of Representatives, condemned the protest by some UNILAG students against the decision by the Federal Government to name the institution after her late father.
The university, known more by its acronym, UNILAG, was established in 1962 by an Act of Parliament.
Against democratic norms
The National President, UNILAG Alumni Association, Prof. Olayide Abass; a former Vice-Chancellor of the institution, Prof. Oye Ibidapo-Obe; all the workers’ unions, including the Academic Staff Union of Universities, faulted the decision which they described as “illegal, provocative, absolutely incongruous and antithetical to democratic norms.”
The alumni association threatened to drag Jonathan and the Federal Government to court over the name change.
Abass said the President did not have the power to change the name of the university, which he said was created by an Act of Parliament.
“It’s either the President does not have a sense of history or that those who are his advisers are not in tune with the nation’s law. UNILAG is the first federal university in the country that was created by an Act of Parliament, so if he wants to change the name, he should go back to the National Assembly and press for the amendment of the university law. He is not a lawmaker and so does not have such power,” he said.
He advised the President to stop acting like a military leader in a democratic dispensation, adding if Abiola must be immortalised, UNILAG, which he said, had become a brand name globally, should not be demeaned.
Abass also faulted the decision, saying it came at a time the university was mourning its late VC, Prof. Tokunbo Sofoluwe, and was planning its golden jubilee.
Also, Ibidapo-Obe wondered why the President did not consult stakeholders before he made the ‘’totally unacceptable” decision.
“It is absolutely incongruous, totally unacceptable and antithetically opposed to democracy that he (President) preaches. Decisions in democracy are made through consultations that is why politicians arrive at all -inclusive decisions but in this case, the President did not consult anybody in UNILAG before he foists this on us.
“It is a deceitful decision made to satisfy people who are not happy with him in the South-West. We are not happy with the decision and that is why the students spontaneously went on the streets to protest it,” he said.
New name at age 50?
He added that it was wrong for the President to change the name of the institution when it was mourning its late VC and planning to celebrate its 50th anniversary.
“Have you ever seen a man who changes his name while celebrating his 50th birthday? This is totally wrong,” Ibidapo-Obe queried.
When reminded that the Federal Government had done a similar thing when it changed the name of the then University of Ife, to Obafemi Awolowo University, Ibidapo-Obe said the two institutions should not be compared.
“That argument cannot stand because Ife was a regional university started by the late Obafemi Awolowo and don’t forget that it was the military that did it without recourse to the law. But UNILAG is a creation of the law and its name can only be changed through the law, not by any presidential fiat,” he said.
He added that good universities all over the world, including UNILAG, were brands whose names should not be changed at will.
On the street
Also, the students who carried various placards with inscriptions such as: “This is not the change youths want,” “Jona has no shoes we gave him bata”, “We remain UNILAG” and “Jonathan, reverse this decision immediately,” barricaded the main gate of the university thus preventing people from coming in or going out of the campus.
From there they trooped to Abule-Oja and the university campus environs, singing anti-Jonathan songs. Consequently, vehicular movement was hampered while commuters were forced to place leaves on their vehicles as a sign of solidarity with the students.
They also blocked the Yaba end of the Murtala Muhammed Way for over thirty minutes.
The Lagos State Deputy Commissioner of Police in charge of operations, Mr. Tunde Sobulo, who led policemen who monitored the students’ protest made a strong appeal to them before they allowed a free flow of traffic about 12:33pm.
Some of them, who spoke with our correspondents, said that the decision was not well-thought out.
“If this decision is not reversed, it will affect the image and global ranking of the university. When this happens, all of us, past and present students, will suffer,” Mr. James Mgurujwen, a 400-Level student in the faculty of education said.
Another student, who simply identified himself as Stephen, said though he did not see anything wrong in immortalising Abiola, UNILAG should not be sacrificed for this purpose.
“I did not know Abiola. I was in primary one in 1993 but my dad told me he loved football and had a football club. If that is true the President should have named the National Stadium after him instead of our university,” the 200-Level student in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences said.
Taiwo Rowaiye, a 400-level student, said it was unfortunate that the president could change the name of the university and close his eyes to the pitiable conditions in which they learn.
He said, “Its clear that we don’t have a caring president. Instead of making teaching and learning convenient for us he is renaming the university.
“There is epileptic supply of electricity to the university campus. Just yesterday(Monday) we only had two hours of power supply.
“Our hostels are in despicable conditions and we often times attend classes without taking our bath all because their is no electricity to pump water.
“Besides, our classrooms are overcrowded and we take lectures in suffocating classrooms and all he could do to better our lot is to rename our university.”
Unions fume
The Chairman, Senior Staff Association of Nigerian Universities, UNILAG Chapter, Mr. Adetola Adetomiwa; the Chairman, Non-Academic Staff Union, Mr. Ganiyu Oseni; and the ASUU Chairman, Dr. Ogbinaka Oghenekaro, also faulted the sudden name change. They described it as misguided and unthinkable.
Adetomiwa said, “His (Jonathan) decision to change the name of UNILAG, a national institution, is misguided. It shows that his advisers do not like him. If he desires to come back for re-election in 2015, he should reverse the decision immediately, otherwise we will mobilise against his political ambition.”
Oseni said that all the workers’ unions on the campus would meet after the burial of Sofoluwe on Thursday (tomorrow) to determine the next line of action that would be taken in ensuring that the decision was reversed.
“But I can tell you that this unthinkable decision will not stand,” he said.
Oseni added that Jonathan’s advisers ought to have advised him to name the Democracy Day after Abiola if truly they believed that he was the martyr of democracy.
MKO Abiola
Abiola, an accountant, politician, businessman and philanthropist, died on July 7, 1998, in the custody of the Federal Government, four years after he had been arrested and detained by the late dictator, Gen. Sani Abacha. Abiola was arrested for daring to declare himself President-elect after winning the 1993 poll later annulled by Abacha’s predecessor, Gen. Ibrahim Babangida.
The annulment and the death of Abiola enraged the citizens. Ditto the government’s continued refusal to acknowledge the place of Abiola in the nation’s democracy.
Both former presidents Olusegun Obasanjo, a kinsman of Abiola from Ogun State; and the late President Umaru Yar’Adua had ignored calls for the immortalisation of the late businessman who contested the 1993 poll on the platform of the defunct Social Democratic Party.

2015: I pray to see PDP gov in Lagos - Babatope

FORMER Minister of Transport, Chief Ebenezer Babatope, has advised members of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Lagos State to be more united towards winning the governorship seat in the state in 2015.
Babatope, who was one of the guest speakers during the Democracy Day symposium, organised by the Lagos State chapter of the PDP, held at 10 Degrees Events Centre, Oregun, Lagos, on Tuesday, said lack of unity and love was responsible for the failures recorded in recent times by the party at state levels, especially in the South-West.
“The truth of the matter is that the family ties within members of the party in the South-West has collapsed. Mark my word, the best electoral victory in 2015 will come from Lagos PDP. I hope to see the PDP governor in Lagos State in 2015 and the efforts must start now,” Babatope said.
In a lecture, entitled “Need to promote family ties in Lagos PDP-winning election as a case study,” Babatope said costly organisation mistake also robbed the party of victory in Ogun State, as he lauded the eight-year administration of Chief Gbenga Daniel.
He traced the defeat of the PDP in Oyo State in 2011 to endless politicial feud.
“I must let you know that we made a mistake in Osun State in the past when we focused more on ethnic representatation. Everybody want his own person to be governor and all that. I was part of the people who made the mistake and we will never repeat it,” Babatope said.
Meanwhile, former PDP national deputy chairman, Chief Olabode George, in his brief remark, dismissed the claim that there was no unity within the PDP in the state.

Alumni rejects change of name


The National Executive Committee of the University of Lagos Alumni Association yesterday rejected the renaming of their university after the late M.K.O. Abiola.
The association in a statement said: “The students and the entire University Community reject the shocking announcement by President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan during his democracy day address renaming the University of Lagos as Moshood Abiola University. 
“The University of Lagos is the first University to be established by an Act of Federal Parliament in 1962 and has built a strong brand name in its 50 years. That is why it is the University of first choice and the nation’s pride. We expect that any change in name should have taken stakeholders interest into consideration and followed due process. We are aware that  neither the Governing Council nor the University Senate nor any other stakeholder was consulted before the change was announced.
“Also, we are not aware of any act of the National Assembly to change the Name. It is therefore inappropriate that Mr. President will attempt to change the name of a 50 year-old without his consent. Did Abiola himself not say ‘you cannot shave a man’s head in his absence?’
“Without prejudice to the person of Late Chief MKO Abiola, we the Alumni Association on behalf of the entire University Community reject the name as announced.”


Alumni rejects change of name

The National Executive Committee of the University of Lagos Alumni Association yesterday rejected the renaming of their university after the late M.K.O. Abiola.
The association in a statement said: “The students and the entire University Community reject the shocking announcement by President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan during his democracy day address renaming the University of Lagos as Moshood Abiola University. 
“The University of Lagos is the first University to be established by an Act of Federal Parliament in 1962 and has built a strong brand name in its 50 years. That is why it is the University of first choice and the nation’s pride. We expect that any change in name should have taken stakeholders interest into consideration and followed due process. We are aware that  neither the Governing Council nor the University Senate nor any other stakeholder was consulted before the change was announced.
“Also, we are not aware of any act of the National Assembly to change the Name. It is therefore inappropriate that Mr. President will attempt to change the name of a 50 year-old without his consent. Did Abiola himself not say ‘you cannot shave a man’s head in his absence?’
“Without prejudice to the person of Late Chief MKO Abiola, we the Alumni Association on behalf of the entire University Community reject the name as announced.”

Mixed reactions trail renaming of UNILAG after Abiola

UNILAG students protesting against the change of name UNILAG students protesting against the change of name
•Students take to the streets
Mixed reactions yesterday greeted President Goodluck Jonathan’s re-naming of the University of Lagos to Moshood Abiola University.
While some respondents supported the idea, others saw it as unnecessary.
The president in his broadcast to the nation to mark Democracy Day and one year of his administration named the university after the late Abiola, the presumed winner of the annulled June 12, 1993 presidential poll.
Students of UNILAG took to major streets around the university in protest against the change of name.
Some of the students, who spoke to NAN, said their action was informed by the sudden change of name of the institution by the Federal Government, adding that “it is ill timed and unacceptable’’.
Mr Muritala Adura, a 400 level student of the Faculty of Political Science said that the decision would be resisted as there was no such plan in place by the founding fathers of the university to change the name.
Adura said that the change of name was uncalled for, especially at a time when the entire university was in a mourning mood.
Miss Chidinma Okafor, a second year student of the Faculty of Education, pleaded with the Federal Government to reconsider reversing its decision so as to maintain the stability and peace that have been existing in the university.
Okafor said that the change of name ought to have been given a serious thought going by the fact that it would truncate a lot of developmental issues that were in the pipeline.
“There are some corporate organisations that had partnered with the institution locally and internationally and must have had a lot of documents and other things printed in the name of unilag.
“How do such people start all over again to change to the new name.
“The name Moshood Abiola University is not even attractive and in the real sense most of us are protesting because our certificates on graduation will not bear that name University of Lagos.
“And which has been the dream of most of the undergraduates,’’ she said
Another student, Joseph Ezekiel, said that he was not against the decision by the Federal Government to immortalise or recognise heroes who toiled for democracy in the country.
He said that the Federal Government should have considered university’s antecedent and what it stood for.
“We are not against government’s decision to honour anyone who deserved to be honoured but what we are saying is that the name of the university, which is almost a household name in the entire continent and beyond cannot just disappear.
“There are other Federal Government institutions scattered all around the country that could be used for such purpose without raising much argument, especially if it is not as popular as the University of Lagos.
“You can see the magnitude of violence that this singular pronouncement has caused and if care is not taken could lead to something else if nothing is done about it immediately.
The Protesting students took to the streets, barricading major highways. They gathered at Oyingbo, Yaba, Sabo, Akoka and Fadeyi on the Ikorodu road, blocking the highways. 
Traffic was brought to a standstill, with a few vehicles plying the roads.
Armed police were stationed at Akoka, a few metres from the campus, but they kept their distance from the irate students.
The acting president of the students union, Mr Idowu Odumose, described the name change as an act of injustice.
“It is an injustice to the institution. The change cannot be done unilaterally without amending the act setting up the university.’’ 
Mr Alli Sanni, the Chairman, National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS), Lagos State Chapter, said the change was announced without consultation with the students and other stakeholders.
“It is shocking to wake up to find out that the school’s identity has been changed.
“The government should have renamed one of the new federal universities after Abiola,’’ he said.
Professor of Law, Mr. Taiwo Osipitan(SAN), Promoter, Coalition of Democrats for Electoral Reforms (CODER), MR. Ayo Opadokun, Trade Unionist, Mr. Frank Kokori and Former Executive Director, Civil Liberties Organisation, (CLO) Mr. Abdul Oroh, commended Jonathan for his good intention.
Osipitan said: “I must commend the President for remembering to honour Abiola, but the President should know that the only way University of Lagos can be renamed is through the National Assembly  because it is an institution that is established by law and the National Assembly will have to amend the law establishing the university.
“If the president really wants to honour Abiola, he should have thought of naming one of the new federal universities after him because UNILAG is a very cosmopolitan institution with local and international image,” he said.
Opadokun commended the president for the belated recognition bestowed on Abiola, even as he queried the process that led to the pronouncement.
“I think that the thought or process that led to the pronouncement is questionable, faulty and not fully considered.” Opadokun said.
Kokori said renaming UNILAG was not the peoples’ priority at the moment, although he expressed appreciation to the president for honouring Abiola.
“I am happy, even though it is not the peoples’ priority for now. I won’t talk further,” he said.
Oroh  noted that Abiola while he was alive, contributed financially to support many Nigerian universities in their trying times, adding that he died in the struggle for democracy.
“MKO was denied an election that was acclaimed the freest and fairest in the history of Nigeria. In his struggle for democracy, he was imprisoned after which he died on the eve of reclaiming his mandate. So, there is nothing wrong with the president honouring him by renaming UNILAG after him. Havard was University in the United Sates, was New College but renamed after John Harvard.
The Yoruba Ronu Leadership Forum (YRLF) hailed President Jonathan for the action.
In a statement by its National Secretary Akin Malaolu, the Forum said the President “deserves commendation for his courage to do what his predecessors failed to do.” 
It said: “Abiola paid the supreme price with his life for democracy which we are all enjoying. Nigerians have clamoured for him to be appropriately honoured. This has been done by the President, it is worthy of commendation.” 
The National Vice-President, Academic Staff Union of Universities, (ASUU), Dr Nasir Fagge, told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) that the renaming of the university was a welcome development. 
“It is a welcome development to the country’s democracy. The government has the right to rename any institution or national monument,’’ he said.
Head of the Department of Mass Communication in the university,  Prof. Ralph Akinfeleye, criticised the renaming of the institution.
Describing it as a misplaced priority, the don noted that the announcement came at a time when the university was still mourning the death of its Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Adetokunbo Sofoluwe.
Akinfeleye said: “The renaming came at a wrong time and it was not done in accordance with the law establishing the institution.
“It not a wrong thing to honour the late Abiola, who sacrificed so much during his life time for democracy, but the process and choice of institution, is wrong.
“ Abiola was not a sectional leader. If any honour should be given to him, it should be done in the Federal Capital Territory.” 
He suggested that the national stadium or the University of Abuja should be named after the late politician.
Another UNILAG lecturer, Dr Jide Oluwajuyitan, said the late Abiola was bigger than the university and should be accorded a better national honour.
Oluwajuyitan, a lecturer in the Department of Political Science, noted that most of the current students might not know Abiola and the significance of naming the school after him.
“ Abiola is bigger than UNILAG and he deserves more honour in Abuja and not in the Southwest where he hailed from.’’
Senior Lecturer, Mass Communication Department, UNILAG, Dr  Olubunmi Ajibade, said there was need for Federal Government to reconsider its decision by reverting to the status quo to forestall breakdown of peace on campus.
Olubunmi said there was nothing wrong in recognising and immortalising those who were symbols of democracy but that such decision ought to have gone through the parliament to be debated upon.
He said: “As you can see, the entire university is in a state of chaos because of the president’s pronouncement and this could lead to something else.
“We know very well that the Federal Government is the proprietor of the university but decisions such as this ought to have been given a second thought and approached with caution.
“The situation on campus would have even been worse if not for the registrar who has been on ground to douse the tension by pleading with the students.” 
Human rights lawyer Bamidele Aturu said:“It is a welcome development, but it is not enough. What is more important is for Nigerians to reap the dividends of the democracy that Abiola died for.”
The  founder of the Odu’a People’s Congress (OPC), Dr Frederick Faseun, said the renaming had “downgraded the university’’.
“Abiola was my very good friend, but I still do not support the naming of the University of Lagos after him based on local sentiment.
“Obviously, Abiola merits any democratic concept that could be named after him, but his aspirations had nothing to do with a university of the status of UNILAG,’’ he said.
Dr. Pat Utomi, the 2011 Presidential Candidate of the Social Democratic Mega Party (SDMP), said it was a good thing to name a monument after Abiola, but more consultations should have been held to determine what was most suitable.
“The Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, should have been named after him.’’
The Director of Strategy, Coalition of Odu’a Self-Determination Groups (COSEG), Mr Rasaq Oladosu, said any monument outside the Southwest would have been ideal for Abiola.
The  Save Nigeria Group (SNG) has said Abiola deserved the highest honour in the land.
It said: “While acknowledging the place of Abiola in the political history of Nigeria, we would want the highest possible honour for him.
“We, however, deplore the renaming of the University of Lagos after him,’’the SNG said in a statement signed by its spokesman, Mr Yinka Odumakin, in Lagos yesterday.
“We restate our demand that Abiola must be given a befitting honour for the sacrifices he made for democracy in Nigeria in a decent and worthy manner.”

Court dismisses suit against Salami's reinstatement

Justice Salami Justice Salami
An Abuja Federal High Court on Wednesday dismissed a suit, challenging the planned reinstatement of the suspended President of the Court of Appeal (PCA), Justice Isa Ayo Salami, for lacking in merit.
A lawyer, Noah Ajare, had sued the National Judicial Council (NJC) and the Judicial Stakeholders Review Committee chaired by former Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Mohammed Uwais.
He was aggrieved over the recommendation of the Uwais committee to the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Dahiru Musdapher to reinstate Justice Salami.
He asked the court to restrain the NJC from deliberating on the said recommendation.
He also prayed for an order of interim injunction restraining the council and the panel from holding further meetings, discussion and all recommendations for the reinstatement of Salami pending the hearing of the substantive matter.
But, at the end of its meeting in Abuja on May 10, the council recommended to President Goodluck Jonathan to approve the reinstatement of Justice Salami.
A few days later, Ajare who claimed he had no personal interest in the whole saga rushed to the court again to file another suit to restrain Jonathan from approving the recommendation.
That suit is pending before Justice Adamu Bello.
Ruling on the suit against the NJC and the Uwais committee on Wednesday, Justice Abdul Kafarati said the Plaintiff has no locus standi to initiate the action.
Ajare had relied on his membership of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) to file the suit.
But the Judge held that "with due respect, that alone cannot confer locus standi on him. 
He can only have locus standi if he can show special interest over and above others or show that his interest will be adversely affected." 
Describing the Plaintiff as a busy-body, the court held that the NJC needs no interference of his to resolve its issues.
"The issue of reinstatement of Justice Salami can be decided without the presence of the Plaintiff. To me, the Plaintiff has no work to do; he has no work to do."
"The second Defendant (Uwais Reform Committee) is not a legal person. The committee having been dissolved and not being a creation of the law, the name is hereby struck out from the suit. The case has no merit; it is accordingly dismissed," the judge ruled.

UK: Nigerians to be screened for Tuberculosis


British PM, David Cameron British PM, David Cameron

Nigerians travelling to the United Kingdom will require pre-entry tuberculosis screening with effect from 2013, the spokesman of the British High Commission, Mr. Hooman Nouruzi, has said.  
Nouruzi told the News Agency of Nigeria on Wednesday in Abuja that the policy affected 67 countries listed as `tuberculosis endemic’ by the World Health Organisation.
He said that under the new scheme, travellers to the UK would be tested for tuberculosis as part of the visa procedure.  
``The UK Border Agency carries out pre-entry screening for TB for non-EEA migrants who are resident in 15 countries entering the UK for six months or more. 
``We are proposing to extend pre-entry screening of applicants to an additional 67 countries, which have been identified using WHO data, as having a high incidence of TB,’’ Nouruzi said. 
NAN reports that the 15 nations currently being screened for TB include Bangladesh, Cambodia, Ghana, Burkina Faso, Cote d’Ivoire, Togo, Niger, Kenya, Eritrea, Somalia, Pakistan, Sudan, Tanzania, Thailand and Laos. 
Although Nouruzi was not definite on when in 2013 they will start screening Nigerians travelling to the UK, he said some hospitals would be designated for the exercise. 
``We will implement the changes in phases and complete the roll out to all on the WHO high incidence list by the end of 2013,’’ he said.
NAN reports that no fewer than 10,000 UK visas are issued monthly in Nigeria, a figure which rises during the summer months of June, July and August.

Monday, 28 May 2012

What ‘s So Bad About Sugar?

Suppose you take a bottle of soft drink. The soft drink contains a concentrated solution of sugar that actually causes the lining of the stomach to hurt. The nerves in the stomach lining send a message to the brain, “Hey, I have been flooded with a supersaturated solution of sugar, and it’s painful. Do me a favour; make this person thirsty. Tell him to take a drink of water so the sugar will be diluted. That will help a little bit. Then send a message to the pancreas, and tell it to speed up the production of insulin to handle all the sugar.”
Friends, have you noticed that each time you take a drink or eat some foods that contains sugar, you feel like taking water immediately? This is what happens.
The brain does exactly what the messages coming into it say should be done. It tells you to get a drink and it sends clear signals to the pancreas, which responds immediately. More insulin comes quickly flowing in.
The pancreas speed up, working faster and faster as it works harder and harder. Before long it has enabled the body to handle the flood of sugar. Some has been stored in the liver, some in the muscles, some converted to fat and some used for energy .
When the supply of sugar is accommodated, the pancreas sends out an SOS to the brain it says, ” Hey! Go tell my boss to go and eat more food. I’m ready for work, and it takes me a while to slow down. If I send more insulin into his stomach, he will black out in an insulin shock.” This condition scares everybody. The victim looks and acts as if he’s going to die, and some do.
If you eat sweets right before you go to bed, you may awaken in the middle of the night with a strong urge to get something more to eat. Promise yourself that you will learn not to flood your body with concentrated sweets, especially on an empty stomach or before going to bed at night.
How Bad Can Sugar Be?
Sugar and sweet foods are such a part of our lives that it’s hard to believe they could be all that bad for us. Nigerians have made sugar a part of our diet. We take our garri,pap, tea, with sugar.
Let’s look at some of the health problems created by this innocent-looking substance.
1. Sugar adds only calories and weights to our bodies. It contains absolutely no vitamins, minerals, amino acids, or other nutrients.
2. Excess sugar causes a rise in blood fat. This condition contributes to high blood pressure and heart attacks.
3. Cavities in our teeth are primarily caused by eating too much sugar. Chewing gum and sweets that remain in the mouth for long periods bathe the teeth with sugar and create tooth decay.
4. Sugar causes rapid rise in blood sugar levels, sometimes causing a person to swim from hypoglycaemia(abnormal low blood sugar due to excess insulin or a poor diet) to diabetes within a one-hour period, or even less. Headaches, fatigue, forgetfulness, irritability and blurred vision can result.
5. Too much sugar in the diet can trigger the onset of diabetes in individuals with an inherited weakness towards this disease. It causes the arteries to narrow so that the blood flow is hindered. This brings on premature ageing and affects the eyes and kidneys. People with diabetes often suffer disabling complications and have a shortened life span.
6. Sugar reduces the body’s ability to destroy bacteria and fight infection. When we eat as much as 24 teaspoons of sugar in a short time, the ability of the white blood cells to destroy bacteria is reduced by 92%. Our immune system is impaired and we become easy prey to all kinds infections.
Do we need any sugar in our diets? No! We do not need any simple sugars like cane sugar and white sugar. If we eat fruits and complex carbohydrates foods like beans, vegetables, whole grain breads and cereals, nuts, seeds, we can get more than enough sugar in our diets. Also fibre in plants has an incredible balancing effect on blood sugar and the entire digestive system.
In places where 80% of the total diet is in the form of complex carbohydrates, people have virtually no tooth decay, no heart attacks, no cancer, no obesity, and no arthritis. It’s worth giving up sugar and sweets to have the benefit of good health and a productive life.
For a healthier you, exercise must be part of your daily routine. Exercise awakens your metabolism to burn more calories even when you are resting. Find some time to move your body. Thirty minutes brisk walk five times a week will do a lot of good to your heart and weight.

Dealing With Damaged Emotions

The act of managing damaged emotions is in fact a form of repair work carried out by a sincere heart that is ready to face facts and gradually reach for healing. Though in some cases, the assistance of a counsellor or therapist might be needed but working with a client who is neither willing nor ready to open up leads you no where than frustration. The main material to work with is the information gotten from clients which helps you decide how to handle their situation.
Everyone has got an emotional scar, whether they realise it or not. The depth of whatever wound they would have been exposed to go a long way to determine how they respond to situations and life in general. Being wounded by your spouse is a terrible thing but what do you do, especially when they do so on purpose? Don’t let your whole life depend entirely on feelings.
What remains a mystery is the attempt at treating others the same we were treated. Faith, a mother of five lamented the other time: “I did not like the way my mother treated me but I hear myself talk to my daughters the same way, ask them the same questions I was asked, display the same fears, express same suspicion and even use the same voice tone as my mom. I know I was never happy the way things were going with me in my parents’ house, but have I been able to offer my children anything better? It’s like the way I was treated has become the only way I know to treat others yet something tells me it could be better.”
Important to note about damaged emotions is the fact that it happens to all; you only clean up your splash and choose to move on. You cannot out-grow being hurt; people would always offend, hurt or disrespect your feelings. This is not something you think would pass with time. Every phase of your life brings its unique challenges and being able to cope is a function of choice and inner strength. The task of picking bits and pieces of the battered ‘you’ can only be best done by you; though sometimes a little help and support from others work well but you need to identify those sensitive spots and bring healing to them if you must live a good life. You have to constantly renew your mind by removing negative thoughts and feelings about you and others by replacing them with positive ones. Where someone used negative words on you, say the exact opposite to yourself and repeat it until it registers on your mind. For instance, someone saying “you are not good on your job”; you’ll need to enumerate all the things you’ve done well in the course of that job, congratulate yourself and aspire to be better. If sincerely you are not good enough on the job, there is no need feeling bad about the comments; although it might have been carelessly done, encourage yourself to be the best and attract a positive comment if possible. Work on your weaknesses and aim at getting better at what you do.
Damaged emotions may result in low self worth, depression, perfectionism, unnecessary criticism, self pity, anger, etc.
Steps to take:
• Accept that you need help and figure out what should be done. Where additional or external help is needed, feel free to ask for a hand.
•Don’t be all by yourself. It’s true that we do not want to wash our dirty linen outside for others to see but finding an experienced person to share your problems could be of great help.
•Find out why you feel the way you do and if it’s because you are trying to impress some people while you end up sad; look into the matter again: I don’t think life is all about satisfying the standard people have set for you.
•Guard your heart, do not be a dumping ground for people’s negatives. You might not be able to control what people say to you nor the way they treat you but you can chose to react or respond in certain ways. Tossing your emotions before people makes you highly vulnerable. Over time, when people who purposely unleash negatives on you discover you are not bothered by their venom, things begin to change for your own good. They might seek other preys and leave you alone since you are not willing to give them the satisfaction (response) they seek in their victims.
•Treat things lightly. Ignoring or making fun of people who purposely intended to mess you up before others is an effective way of putting them on the spot. Do not walk down the road of self-defence, allow them to do all the explanations and appear foolish.
•Draw up a number of thoughts that bring smiles to your face and dwell on them. Allow the bad moments to pass. The fact that you made a mistake during a public speech should not make you stay home sulking for days as if no one has ever made mistakes; the people you are so concerned about might not even attach so much value to what happened and even if it’s on the pages of newspapers, news happens everyday; move on with your life and let the person who has never made mistakes be the first to judge you.
•Consciously expose yourself to things that can speed up your healing —reading, socialising, relaxing, vacation and things that would generally make you feel better about ‘you’.

Things to note about emotional damage:
•The cycle seems unbroken: It is like paying back others for what you suffered and they too would want to do same to others and life continues in pains. You can imagine a young man who refuses to trust his wife because his ex-cheated on him. Why?
•There is a severe battle with constant memory replay. Some people say forgiving does not wipe your memory and feelings sometimes are evoked by memories but you can tell yourself to refuse responding to unhealthy feelings.
•You place yourself in the position of being a victim and look for every opportunity to retaliate.
•Love is far from what you plan to express; you haven’t received it so where would you get reserves to share?
Guess what? People who have been badly treated can decide to do something nice to others so they do not suffer like them, they can chose to be loving and accommodating bearing in mind the pains of rejection and harshness they had passed through. This I call a higher life —where you want to make others happy despite your previous hurt. Let’s learn to express real love to our spouses, children, friends, colleagues and loved ones so the world can be a better place.

Edo Gov Race: Candidate Threatens To Sue INEC

The Action Alliance (AA) governorship candidate in the 14 July, 2012 governorship election in Edo State, southsouth Nigeria, Ishaka Paul Ofemile, has asked the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to reverse its decision disqualifying him from the election or face a legal action.
Ofemile’s disqualification by INEC, it was learnt, was sequel to the late submission of forms CF 001B and CF 002B by his party allegedly caused by logistics problems.
He however urged INEC to grant him waiver on the late submission of the forms.
While addressing journalists on Sunday at the NUJ Press Centre, in Benin City, the candidate who said he learnt about his disqualification over AIT and NTA network news last Thursday, said the forms arrived INEC Headquarters in Abuja on Tuesday, 15 May, 2012, 24 hours after the closure date.
While lamenting the colossal loss of fund spent on neck-breaking campaign/rallies in preparation for the election that produced his candidacy, he added “I am qualified for the election under any known law or condition set by INEC, except that my INEC forms CF 001B and CF 002B reached INEC Abuja on the morning of Tuesday 15 May, 2012; instead of Monday 14 May, 2012.
“The primaries in which I was elected as Action Alliance Governorship Candidate was done on Saturday 12 May, 2012, and was monitored by INEC headquarters staff in Benin City. Its Abuja office cannot therefore deny knowing me. INEC was promptly notified in writing with the original copy of Action Alliance for Edo state July 14, 2012 election dated 12 May 2012,” said the governorship hopeful.
Ofemile therefore gave INEC a 72-hour ultimatum, beginning from Friday May 25 for it to clear him for the election, adding that his disqualification was an afterthought.
“I see the said disqualification as an attempt to ruin my political life after the waiver of continuous voters’ registration in Edo State for the Action Congress of Nigeria and Comrade Adams Oshiomhole; and I reject it,” he added.
By Jethro Ibileke/Benin City

Eko Atlantic City to create 150,000 jobs


Officials of Energyx at the Eko Atlantic City site.  INSET: Commissioner for Waterfront Infrastructure Development Prince Oniru Officials of Energyx at the Eko Atlantic City site. INSET: Commissioner for Waterfront Infrastructure Development Prince Oniru
The Lagos State Government has said the Eko Atlantic City will provide about 150,000 jobs when completed. 
Making this known while unveiling the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the project, the Commissioner of Waterfront Infrastructure Development, Prince Adesegun Oniru, said the EIA was done in compliance with global standards and regulations. 
He was joined by officials of South Energyx Nigeria Limited and Royal Haskoning of Holland, developers and consultants of the Eko Atlantic City. 
Oniru said about 17 expatriates and 500 Nigerian engineers are working on the project, adding that a wall, The Great Wall of Lagos, would be built to protect the city from the ocean. 
The developer has 78 years certificate of occupancy. Three million square metres of land had been reclaimed from the ocean out of the nine million square metres proposed for the city.  
The Managing Director of the South Energyx Nigeria Limited (developers of the Eko Atlantic City), Mr. David Frame, expressed the hope that the City will make the state the choice destination for investors, tourists and financial institutions. 
He said: “When completed, the Eko Atlantic City project would attract tourists and visitors across the world, thereby boosting revenue generation.
“People would in the next 10 years be trooping to Lagos just as they are doing to Dubai. The city would have a Marina of 350 metres diametre and will provide outlet for those who wants to enjoy the canal system. The city project will provide accommodation for 250, 000 people.” 
On the EIA, Mr. Dirk Heijboer of Royal Haskoning, said the project would have positive effect on the economy of the state.   
He said: “It is concluded that the project will have major positive effects in restoring and protecting the shoreline and minimal side effects. A scoping exercise was carried out to identify the main issues that needed addressing as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment. 
“Following this, a report was prepared and the Terms of Reference for the EIA were agreed with the Federal Ministry of Environment, FME, the national regulatory authority on the project. 
“Extensive consultations was carried out throughout the EIA process. They started during the scoping phase with meetings with FME, the Lagos State Ministry of the Environment and the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA). 
“Following these sessions, further consultations were expanded to cover a wider range of stakeholders and local community leaders. Consultation and liaison with relevant parties will continue. 
“The Eko Atlantic Project, has completed a full and comprehensive Environmental and Social Impact Assessment on the entire land reclamation works and its sea wall protection as required under the Nigerian Environmental Impact Assessment Act No. 86 of 1992. The EIA has been carried out in accordance with these regulations. 
“The EIA was submitted to the Federal Ministry of Environment and underwent public consultation in November 2011. 
“In January, the Federal Ministry of Environment gave EIA Approval for Eko Atlantic reclamation works and sea-wall protection in combination with established procedures for ongoing compliance,” he added.

Terrorism: Panel advises Nigeria to join forces with US

Amb. Usman G. Galtimari Amb. Usman G. Galtimari
SECURITY agents will be more confident in fighting terrorism, should the Federal Government accept a recommendation that they get life insurance.
Besides, the Galtimari Presidential Committee on security challenges in the Northeast has advised the Federal Government to seek the cooperation of the United States and nations with similar experience to stem the tide of bombings perpetrated by the Islamist group, Boko Haram (western education is sin). 
The panel believes life insurance cover will encourage security agents to bodly face security challenges. 
It advised President Goodluck Jonathan to create an informal forum for discussing security issues with governors and other stakeholders. 
Also, the panel is seeking the abolition of indigeneship in all the 36 states. 
These highlights, exclusively obtained by The Nation, are some of the key recommendations of the panel. 
The committee was inaugurated by the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Chief Anyim Pius Anyim, on August 2, last year. 
Members of the committee are: Amb. Usman G. Galtimari(Chairman), Senator Ali Ndume, Chief Joe-Kyeri Gadzama(SAN), Col. Musa Shehu(rtd), Senator Bala Mohammed, Dr. Bello Mohammed, Chief Emeka Wogu and Alhaji A.B. Shehu. 
Following the submission of a final report by the panel last September, the SGF raised a seven-man White Paper Drafting Committee which was headed by Comrade A. Mora. 
Other members of the committee are: Alh. Bukar Tijani, Esther G. Gonda; Alh. Abdullahi Yola, Mr. Usman Abubakar, Mr. Jubril Adeniji; Mr. L.E. Njoku, and Mr. U. Onwuanuokwu. 
The main report and the government’s position have been harmonised in the White Paper. 
The panel emphasised intelligence sharing and cooperation with the United States and others. 
The report said: “The committee observed that there is an apparent lack of strong and enduring international engagement and cooperation with some nations that experienced terrorism, such as the United States of America . The lack of intelligence sharing to avert unpleasant situations should be addressed. 
“The Committee’s findings in respect of links between the sect and international terrorist organisations and the sophistication of sect’s attacks (especially the attack on the United Nations’ Building) demand international cooperation and engagement in the area of intelligence gathering and dissemination of information.” 
“The war on terrorism can only be won through effective collaboration with countries that have experienced the threat. 
“The Federal Government should diversify and strengthen its means of creating avenues for international intelligence sharing and inter-agency cooperation through diplomatic channels/pacts,” it said. 
The committee urged President Goodluck Jonathan to create an informal forum for discussing security issues with governors and other stakeholders. 
The panel specifically demanded one-on-one discussions between the President and governors on security matters. 
The report added: “The performance of security operatives can be improved upon, if certain variables are provided. As a way forward, government should ensure that security agents are given life insurance cover and incentives in form of extra allowances. 
“In addition, security agents in the course of duty should have their entitlements promptly paid in order to sustain the families they left behind and to demonstrate that they did not die in vain. 
“The Federal Government should create an informal forum at the highest level, where Mr. President will discuss national security issues with governors and other major stakeholders from time to time. 
“Again, there is an urgent need to arrange an informal forum where Mr. President will grant audience to each state governor on one-on-one basis where issues of security could be addressed.” 
The committee identified the use of commercial motor-cyclists for terror attacks and asked the government to regulate their operation. 
“The committee observed that motor-cycles are being used to commit. It recommended that all commercial motor-cycle riders should be registered, given reflective jackets and identity cards,” it added. 
On religious intolerance in the North, the panel urged the Federal Government to prevail on states in the North to be fair.
The report said: “There were alleged neglect and lack of concern by some state governments in the North to some particular faith where their legitimate rights and demands are ignored for no apparent reasons other than possibly on the grounds that they constitute a minority. 
“Some state governments in the North that were alleged to have deliberately denied the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy(C of O) to churches should be advised to desist from such acts. 
“They should be immediately issued with C of O. Also, Christian Religious Knowledge (CRK) should be allowed to be taught in schools alongside Islamic Religious Knowledge/Studies in state where such is not done. 
“Government accepts this recommendation.” 
The committee also called for the abolition of indigeneship in the country with the adoption of Sokoto Model. 
He said: “As a roadmap to the return of peace to the North-East zone and other parts of Nigeria , government should endevaour to integrate and unite Nigerians by rejecting those things that divide us, such as statism and the settler/indigene syndrome. Nigerians should be encouraged to se other Nigerians as compatriots who can live and do business anywhere in the country without any recourse to religion or ethnicity. 
“The committee was availed with the existence of a unique approach by the Sokoto State Government where everybody residing in the state is considered and accorded indigeneship with full rights to free primary education, registration of premises and ownership of property including employment opportunities and right to contest political offices. 
“The Federal Government should encourage other states in the Federation to adopt Sokoto State model where everybody is considered and accorded indigeneship with full rights to free primary education, registration of premises and ownership of property, including employment opportunities and right to contest political offices. 
“Government accepts this recommendation.”

PDP in dilemma over Ogun crisis


The National Working Committee (NWC) of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) is now in a dilemma on how to resolve the crisis rocking its Ogun State chapter as the local government election in the state is fast approaching.
The NWC directed that a new state congress should be held last Saturday to elect new executives who would in turn organise primaries for the selection of candidates for the council election.This was, however, put on hold due to the various litigations instituted by a faction of the party.
Going by the guidelines released by the Ogun State Independent Electoral Commission (OSIEC), ahead of the local government election fixed for July 21, this year, collection and submission of nomination forms by candidates would close on June 5 and there is no room for independent candidates.
It was gathered that all efforts to reconcile the various factions in the multi-faceted crisis before now had proved abortive as all the gladiators refused to shift ground, while several cases are before the courts thereby compounding the situation.
Upon assumption of office, the Alhaji Bamanga Tukur-led NWC directed the South West Zonal Working Committee of the party to take over the affairs of the state chapter of the party as part of efforts to resolve the crisis.
A reliable source at the national secretariat of the party in Abuja told the Nigerian Tribune in confidence that the leadership of the party was in total dilemma on how best to resolve the crisis in the state because of the personalities involved and the legal dimension introduced to it as well as the external influence.
The also source disclosed that the party’s NWC would meet this week to find a way forward.

Moses in camp, Keshi drops five

Victor Moses
Wigan Athletic’s Victor Moses became the first Europe-based player to hit the Super Eagles camp ahead of the busy June schedule for the Nigeria national team.
Moses arrived at the Eagles temporary camp in Lagos on Sunday just before the team’s departure for Calabar where they will play the qualifying games against Namibia and Rwanda
And just as Moses and the rest of the players were heading to Calabar, Eagles coach Stephen Keshi dropped five players. Those dropped on Saturday are Ugonna Uzochukwu of Rangers International, Enyimba’s Gbolahan Salami, Ossai Uche of Warri Wolves, Heartland’s goalkeeper, Dan Akpeyi and his counterpart from Sharks, Okemuteh Odah. All five were part of the team that featured against Peru last Thursday. The 12 Nigeria-based professionals who made the list are Chigozie Agbim, Azubuike Egwueke, Sunday Mba, Ejike Uzoenyi, Juwon Oshaniwa, Izu Azuka, Godfrey Oboabona, Henry Uche, Kalu Uche, Papa Idris, Gabriel Reuben, Obinna Nwachukwu and Turkey-based Ekigho Ehiosun.
Keshi told those dropped to have an open mind as they could still return to the team in future.
He said, “If I have my way all of us would remain in camp, but we have reached a crucial bend and only the best of the best will be needed. But that does not mean that you are not good enough, which is why I can say that we may call you again soon. Go and maintain regular outing for your clubs. As you know, that will form the basis of your recall.”
The Eagles on Sunday afternoon arrived in Calabar to begin preparations for Sunday’s game against Namibia in the race to the 2014 World Cup in Brazil.
It was a carnival-like atmosphere on Sunday evening, when they landed at the Margaret Ekpo International Airport. At the head of the Cross River State welcome party was the Commissioner for Sports, Mr. Patrick Ugbe, who led them to the Metropolitan Hotel.
An excited Keshi said it had been long since he saw such amazing welcome for the national team.
“We thank Governor Liyel Imoke, the Nigeria Football Federation and the good people of Cross River State.We assure them that on match day we will make them proud hosts of the national team.

First year anniversary: Jonathan’s Facebook’s friends’ damning verdict

First year anniversary: Jonathan’s Facebook’s friends’ damning verdict

As President Goodluck Jonathan marks his first year in office on May 29, his comment on the first anniversary on his Facebook has attracted varying degree of reactions from some of his friends and followers on the social media platform.
 His comment on the anniversary uploaded on Monday, May 14 stated thus:
“As we approach the first anniversary of this administration and because we derive our mandate from the people by the way of free and fair election, I have instructed members of the Executive Council of the Federation to render an account of stewardship to Nigerians.
“This rendering by the way of televised live ministerial briefings are ongoing and I encourage all Nigerians to watch these briefings and give me feedback on this page.
“Feedback is the synergy that is needed to make government work better for you and as I have demonstrated from inception of this page. I take your feedback into account in formation of government policy as well as the decision making process” the president wrote.
As at the time of this report, about 2,720 comments and 922 likes have been recorded on the anniversary message.  While 64 per cent of the respondents expressed their displeasure on Jonathan’s administration’s performance so far, 36 per cent gave him a pass mark but urged him to speed up his transformation agenda.
Some of the comments on the anniversary message are as follows:
 Robert Akpebi: Goodluck should forget about 2015, complete your tenure and leave for more qualified person. You forgot to bring development to your home state like the abandoned East/West road.
Agare Isaac: Sir, you have failed me in the area of security, your administration has cost the death of 1,800 people, unlike our Military Heads of State. Going by this data, by 2015, about 800,000 to 1,000,000 souls would have gone.
Sufya Deen Ibrahim: Sir, you have a silver tongue like the Niger State Governor ( Talba).
Duru Vincent: One year after your Presidential pronouncement of job offer and immortalization of slain Bauchi NYSC Corp members, this promise is yet to be fulfilled.
Bisi Awoeyo: Mr. President, your anniversary gift to Nigerians like the New Year subsidy gift, is the tariff for darkness instead of light.
Opeodu Olutayo: Where is the electricity to watch the briefings?
Akan Martins: Mr. President, my regards, ministerial briefings is good, but people in the village might not be part of this.
Others include:
Ayodele David: Please, it is time you step on toes to move this country forward.
Michael Abugu: A big congratulation for job well done, we have never witness unprecedented transparency a premise upon which your government was built, your promises for renovation of refinery, railway transportation has been fulfilled. To curb insecurity, please retrain the armed forces.
Balogun Abiodun: Mr. President, it is not the numbers of years, that matter but your legacy. You may be trying but trying is not enough. Let power be your only agenda at affordable rate. I want to assure you that Nigerians will forgive your mistakes.